Ring of Conservative Sites Ring of Conservative Sites
JOIN!

[ Prev | Skip Prev | Prev 5 | List |
Rand | Next 5 | Skip Next | Next ]

Monday, October 31, 2005

Botaxes And Frivolous Purchases

3 weeks ago the NYT in the NJ section wrote about the NJ tax on cosmetic surgery. They call it cheekily "Botaxes". The condescension of the writer towards people who purchase medical services for physical enhancement is palpable. How do you like this comment:

How often do you feel like applauding the State Legislature? But this was a surprisingly innovative idea. Consider: A cash-strapped state and 1.3 million residents without health insurance, their hospital costs reimbursed by aforementioned state. At the same time, hordes of people willing and able to come up with substantial sums to buy firmer bodies, more symmetrical faces.

But there is hope since the revenues are not matching the expectations:

But doctors argue that Botaxes, as some wit dubbed them, discriminate against women, the majority of their patients. (By which logic, the sales tax on lipstick should be lifted, too.) They complain about cumbersome paperwork; they worry that consumers will head for Pennsylvania or New York. Medically necessary reconstructive surgery remains exempt, but ''we really don't want to open the door to taxing any medical procedure,'' Dr. Hetzler explained to me.

The reason doctors are persuading legislators, though, has more to do with financial disappointment. State forecasters predicted that Botaxes would raise $24 million a year. Instead, first-year revenue amounted to just $7.5 million. Now even Assemblyman Joseph Cryan, who introduced the legislation, says he's inclined toward repeal because ''economically, it hasn't made sense.''

Note the writer's plea for more such taxes:

[A]fter writing checks for $8,500 or more for trimmer triceps, kicking in a few hundred additional bucks for those who can't afford heart bypasses seems reasonable.

So Mr. Cryan, a modest proposal: Let's expand, not repeal. I suggest a Tanning Tax on patrons of those carcinogenic salons. And, in a blow for gender equality, a Toupee Tax. And perhaps a surcharge, the Just Plain Pathetic Tax, on red sports cars for buyers over 45.

Pathetic.

4 Comments:

At 12:27 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

What a great site » »

 
At 5:36 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

What a great site film editing schools

 
At 9:14 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

What a great site Buy phendimetrazine online c.o.d. http://www.pancreatic-cancer-8.info names domain Levitra order buy adipex perfumes Lexapro uk Great britain lipitor for sale Zyban law suit history 1982 cadillac seville refinance Bmw suppliers Modified car interior cellulite patio furniture verizon wireless phone plans Gay boys oral car covers No faxing payday loan up to $1500 Purchase lg phones

 
At 2:23 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Hey, landed on your blog, nice stuff. I found a cool new tool for our blogs... www.widgetmate.com It helps get latest news for our keywords directly on to our blog. I added it on mine. Worked like a charm.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home

Ring of Conservative Sites Ring of Conservative Sites
JOIN!

[ Prev | Skip Prev | Prev 5 | List |
Rand | Next 5 | Skip Next | Next ]