Ring of Conservative Sites Ring of Conservative Sites

[ Prev | Skip Prev | Prev 5 | List |
Rand | Next 5 | Skip Next | Next ]

Friday, December 02, 2005

Media Blackout of Lieberman and the Israel-Jew Equation

The 3 major networks have blacked out the Lieberman op-ed in the WSJ discussed a few posts below. Given our nightly reports on anything done by the allegedly corrupt war-hero Murtha and the geopolitical genius Sheehan, shouldn't the former VP-candidate and senior senator from Connecticut get some national face time?

Not if he said anything positive about the war and its likely effects on US interests in the Middle East.

Can it be any clearer that the MSM has a rooting interest in the War Against Terror and this administration? Given that, how can a fair-minded American make a rational decision against it based on the blatant position staked by the MSM?

Steve Mucscatello provides this MSM roundup:

• The Washington Post did not acknowledge Lieberman’s comments in its Nov. 29 and Nov. 30 editions. This despite running a front-page story on Nov. 30 headlined, “U.S. Debate on Pullout Resonates As Troops Engage Sunnis in Talks.”
• The New York Times had no space for Lieberman, either. They did find room, however, to run a Nov. 30 story headlined, “Senator Clinton Calls for Withdrawal from Iraq to Begin in 2006.” This “call” took place in a letter Clinton wrote to constituents.
• The Boston Globe carried a 479-word Associated Press story on Nov. 28 that perverted Lieberman’s comments, focusing on the potential of a “significant” withdrawal in ’06 rather than the progress in Iraq that Lieberman hoped to report.

At least the liberal blogs have provided coverage of Lieberman, though their commentary includes nuggets like:

“Lieberman is an Orthodox Jew (who are generally very anti-Arab and Palestinian) and an AIPAC whore. This war was fought for O.I.L. (Oil Industry, Israel, Logistics of Military - Military Industrial Complex). He's not Connecticut's Senator, he's Ariel Sharon's.”

“This is all about Israel wanting a huge U.S. military presence in the ME [Middle East], and nothing more for Liebershitz. I can't blame Israel for wanting a big bully presence at their back door, so draft-dodger Liebershitz should just be honest about his intentions for BSing us about Iraq.”

Give liberals their due. They really know how to attack their opponents without resorting to racist name-calling and broad generalizations. For the hard of reading, let's follow this equation: 1. A Jewish Senator plus 2. The Middle East equals 3. Jewish Support For Israel.

Read in this column by Clarice Feldman more about this equation's use by liberals like Russert, Matthews, Sheehan, Joe Wilson and Farrakhan.

Here is the liberal's hero Joe Wilson:

“The real agenda in all this, of course, was to redraw the political map of the Middle East. Now that is code, whether you like it or not, but it is code for putting into place the strategy memorandum which was done by Richard Perle and his study group in the mid-90s, which was called ‘A Clean Break: A New Strategy for the Realm’. And what it is, cut to the quick, is if you take out some of these countries, or some of these governments, that are antagonistic to Israel, then you provide the Israeli government with greater wherewithal to impose its terms and conditions on the Palestinian people. . .But that is the real agenda. You can put weapons of mass destruction out there, you can put terrorism out there, you can put liberation out there. Weapons of mass destruction got hard-headed realists on board, through a bunch of lies. . .”

Oh, I get it. Jews lie to Americans in order to begin a war against peaceful Muslims so Israel can continue its dominance over peaceful Palestinians. Christians and Muslims die for the sake of those manipulative Jews. That seems to wrap it up very neatly.


At 9:43 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Boy....is that obvious....blatant bias. George Clooney is getting more coverage for his new movie then Lieberman

At 11:16 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

The liberal bloggers cited (selectively)are nonsensical. Reminds me of the conservative bloggers (selectively)on hillary.

Beat me, daddy!

At 11:26 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Daily Kos is not of the liberal fringe. And NBC, ABC and CBS, NYT and WaPo can't report on it? This is far from selective.

At 7:13 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Wonderful and informative web site. I used information from that site its great. »


Post a Comment

<< Home

Ring of Conservative Sites Ring of Conservative Sites

[ Prev | Skip Prev | Prev 5 | List |
Rand | Next 5 | Skip Next | Next ]